So for the past two days the "Genocide Awareness Project" people have been outside in the quad with their giant anti-abortion display.
Today it finally made me snap. Now I am not strictly pro-choice, in fact I lean more toward pro-life, but given our political climate and the way both women and children are treated in society, I currently vote pro-choice... but that's another tale.
My real problem with the GAP is not their politics vis a vis the abortion issue, but rather the way they mix their anti-abortion message with totally unrelated things.
Next to their images of aborted fetuses (which make sense given their argument) they have:
1. Images of the Holocaust
2. Images of African Americans being lynched
3. Images of animal testing
4. The word Genocide
Now, the word Genocide applies correctly to 2 out of the four things portrayed. The Holocaust and the treatment of blacks in the us could aptly be called "Genocide"
Genocide means the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group.
I pointed this out to them, but they mostly seemed confused. Furthermore I expressed my concern over the fact that they were conflating issues that have no relationship.
Their response? All these things are bad... lol
Um well, ok yes I see that I suppose, but really does this make for a sound argument?
I further pointed out that as white non-Jews their use of racial/ethnic oppression and genocides as a tool for furthering their cause is offensive to those who are actually concerned with racial equality.
Their response? "A black woman showed us support earlier"
Um ok. But one African American showing support doesn't debunk my claim at all. Furthermore this sort of "Token" woman sounds like the old "I'm not racist I have a black friend" argument.
I then inquired about the animal rights issue.
Are you guys pro-Animal rights? Are you vegetarian? (No) Do you work to avoid buying products tested on animals (No). Well then your use of this image is not only totally unrelated to "Genocide" but is also an obvious emotional ploy. You are -- by using this image with no real opposition to what it portrays-- merely exploiting the pain of these animals for your own ends. Making you just as bad as those who test on animals in my mind.
Similarly you are exploiting the suffering of Jews and Af. Am. people with out any real concern about the conditions --present or historical-- of minority peoples.
I also wanted to ask if they found it problematic that dominant white christian ideologies played a fair role in both the Holocaust and the persecution of African Americans. But I refrained on this point.
Thursday, June 4, 2009
GAP and Me : A lesson in argument
Saturday, November 8, 2008
One Down
Today I went to PDX and took the English Literature Subject GRE. I was much dismayed to see that almost all of the questions were British Lit pre-1800... egh. This of course is a section of lit that I know almost nothing about. I answered what I could and left some blank since blank spaces don't really count against you. It was three hours of testing that I would have been happier without, and 150 bucks I would rather have spent on --well on just about anything-- but sadly the Subject GRE is needed by most of the schools I'm looking at.
Posted by Julie at 5:04 PM 4 comments
Labels: Literature, PDX, Politics, Queer, Wharton
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Equality is Equality
It's pretty depressing to think about how many African-Americans voted to preserve or create inequality.
For me Judy Weider says it all.
Posted by Julie at 7:54 PM 1 comments
Free at Last
It’s the answer that led those who have been told for so long by so many to be cynical, and fearful, and doubtful of what we can achieve to put their hands on the arc of history and bend it once more toward the hope of a better day.
It’s been a long time coming, but tonight, because of what we did on this day, in this election, at this defining moment, change has come to America. - Obama
But I want you to know tonight, that we, as a people, will get to the promised land!- MLK
Posted by Julie at 8:54 AM 4 comments
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
Eyes on the Prize!

I am so excited about the election. Having had Bush in office for the past eight years I've felt pretty down about America and our politics. Now for the first time since the great robbery of 2000 I'm excited about the election and hopeful about the future. Naive? Perhaps, but I am still feeling good.
Posted by Julie at 10:16 AM 5 comments
Thursday, October 2, 2008
Debate

Tonight I made pizza and watched the vice presidential debate. It was ok, but nothing stellar. Biden had better (clearer and more direct) answers but that is not shocking at all. Palin was "cute" as usual, and less blatantly stupid. Whatever...no fire was ignited in my heart. It's still Obama all the way, no shocker.
Posted by Julie at 8:28 PM 2 comments
Labels: Politics, TA, tagcloud, teaching, Television
Tuesday, September 16, 2008
The Importance of Credible Sources Strikes Again
As I wrote a few days back, I've become a bit of a fan of FactCheck.org . Every morning, before I read the news I take a look at FactCheck to see what's going on in the world of heinous campaign lies.
Sunday, September 14, 2008
Sustaining Community
Recently, while looking for a plant identification book for completing these vegetation surveys, I stumbled upon a book called Food Not Lawns. The subtitle of this book is, How to Turn Your Yard into a Garden and your Neighborhood into a Community. This got me thinking.
Posted by Julie at 6:52 PM 8 comments
Labels: Ecology, Politics, Sustainability
Friday, September 12, 2008
FactCheck.org
As readers of this blog likely know, I've been keeping my eye on the political scene surrounding the presidential and congressional campaigns. The two things that I've found most shocking lately are:
1. The willingness of the masses to perpetuate outright lies.
2. The damn near illiteracy of many who voice their opinions in public forums
On the first count I have only one thing to say, FactCheck.org This site disputes erroneous claims made against either candidate.
06:28 PM Sep 12 2008
WELL WE HAVE ANOTHER STAR WHO NOES ALL ABOUT SARAH,STICK TO YOUR FAKE MOVIE MAKEING,WE ALL NO WHO YOU WIIL VOTE FOR,MABEY YOU CAN MAKE A MOVIE AND YOU CAN BE HIM YOU NO ALL ABOUT POLITICS
Wow! I've always thought participatory democracy is a great idea, and that elitism is bad....ummm maybe not anymore...just kidding... but really.
Posted by Julie at 7:54 PM 2 comments
Labels: Literacies, Politics
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Free Fruits
We went to EE Wilson for the second day of vegetation surveying. Things went smoothly. I saw a lovely dry marsh and plenty of fruit trees growing wild. I ate some Asian pears and apple or two. Bird and I filled her pockets with plums and a big bowl of blackberries. All delightfully free.
a little more fruitiness... is this a Georgia Peach
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
Timid Men Prefer the Calm of Despotism to the Tempestuous Sea of Liberty
Although I had been planning to avoid politics today I was the recipient of a "banned book list" that Palin supposedly tried to push for while mayor. Book banning is another one of those issues that gets me up in arms so I had to look into it. Although fact checkers have found that the supposed "books banned by Palin" list is questionable, the fact checkers (even the rather right leaning ones) concede that Palin did ask about how to get books banned from the library in Wasilla. The fact checkers also concede that Palin fired (although under pressure from local citizens she later rehired) the librarian whom she originally asked about book banning. Why did she fire the woman? Because she felt the librarian was not "loyal" enough.
Posted by Julie at 4:21 PM 1 comments
Monday, September 8, 2008
Keep Prayin' I'm Still Queer and I Was Created This Way
Posted by Julie at 7:11 PM 4 comments
Friday, August 29, 2008
Ecocritic Meets the VP Nominee
Although I have been frankly anti-political since the Bush fiasco began, this upcoming presidential election is starting to get my attention. Initially, when it started to look like Obama and McCain might be the front runners, I felt both pleased and apathetic. I've always thought of McCain as a somewhat moderate Republican. This simply means that his name does not inspire me to do anything reactive...like scream. In that light he seemed like an acceptable possibility if the more desirable outcome of a Democratic (or more Ideally Green president) could not be achieved. I hadn't looked much into his policies because I already knew that he is anti-Gay marriage and thus I am anti-McCain.
Posted by Julie at 6:02 PM 5 comments

